Level 18 min
One ask
David asks only for a discount and accepts the first fair trade you offer, such as a longer contract or a reference call.
- Discount only
- Accepts a fair trade
The deal is agreed, and procurement wants one more thing before the signature. In this negotiation role play, David, an AI procurement director, asks for a discount and longer payment terms in the last week of your quarter. Practice finding which ask matters to him, pricing every concession and closing on terms you can approve.

The situation
You sell quality management software to food manufacturers, and this deal is yours to close. After a three-month pilot at one plant, the quality director chose your platform for all six of her company’s plants. Your proposal: $180,000 a year on a one-year contract, payment in 30 days. Scope and rollout are agreed. The contract goes through David, the procurement director. It is the last week of your quarter, and he asked for twenty minutes.
The AI character

Cool and businesslike. Polite, brief and in no hurry to show his priorities.
What is scored
In a negotiation, what you gave and what you got back are both on the record. Each criterion is scored from your offers and questions, quoted with timestamped comments, so a concession that bought nothing appears in your own words. If you have a negotiation playbook and discount rules, they can become the criteria.
Answers the 20% and the deadline with what the price covers, not with a smaller number.
Offers a smaller discount in the first reply.
Asks which ask matters more and why, and learns that the payment terms come from his CFO.
Negotiates the discount and the terms as if they weighed the same.
Ties each give to a get: longer payment terms for a longer contract, part of the discount for a reference call.
Gives ground and hopes for goodwill in return.
Puts price, payment terms, contract length and the reference call on the table together and keeps the total inside the approval limit.
Settles one point at a time and runs out of things to trade.
Sums up every agreed term, names who signs and when, and sends the summary the same day.
Ends with “Let me check with my manager and get back to you.”
How the conversation can go

Take 20% off, give us 90-day terms, and we sign this week.
I want this signed this week too. The price covers all six plants and the rollout your quality team planned after the pilot. Before we change anything, which matters more to your side: the 20% or the 90 days?

Both. But the 90 days aren’t mine. Our CFO wants them from every new supplier this year.
Then let’s make 90 days work. Finance can do it on a three-year agreement. On a one-year contract, we stay at 60.

Three years is a real commitment. If I give you three years, I need the 20%.
20% isn’t possible. Here is what I can do: three years, 90-day terms, 8% off every year, and your quality director joins one reference call for us in the spring. If that works, can your CFO sign on Thursday?

Send me that in writing today, and Thursday works.
You’ll have it within the hour: three-year term, 90-day payment, 8% off the annual fee, one reference call in the spring, signature on Thursday.
Every concession bought something, but contract length and terms were settled before the discount came up, so the reference call was your last card. Put the whole package on the table at once, then run it again.
Difficulty
Level 18 min
David asks only for a discount and accepts the first fair trade you offer, such as a longer contract or a reference call.
Level 210 min
He wants 20% off and 90-day terms, and tells you about his CFO’s cash rule as soon as you ask which one matters more.
Level 312 min
The default version. David uses your quarter end against you, keeps the CFO’s rule to himself until the right question and says he is happy to wait until next quarter.
FAQ
Don’t answer a number with a smaller number. Restate what the price covers, ask which of their asks matters most and why, and move only in exchange for something: a longer contract, a reference, an earlier start. Keep price, terms and length on the table together so you don’t run out of things to trade, and close by putting the agreed terms in writing.
Yes. Three people and a sealed note are enough. The note holds David’s secrets: his CFO’s 90-day rule, the vendor his quality director already turned down and next week’s budget review, and whoever plays him reveals each one only when a question earns it. The seller works from the proposal and an 8% limit. The third person keeps a two-column sheet: what was given, and what came back for it. Every line with an empty second column is a lost point. The sample dialogue is one route to a signature, not a script.
From what was offered and asked. The score for holding the price rests on the rep’s first reply to “20% off,” the score for trades on each give and what came back for it, and a concession with nothing attached is quoted as it was said. How the rep sounds is not part of it: there is no voice or emotion analysis. David’s mood belongs to the character and moves with what the rep offers and asks.
Yes. In the scenario builder, replace our $180,000 proposal and 8% limit with your price list, the discount each level of your team can approve and the payment terms your finance team accepts. Add the procurement roles your reps actually face, and score the call against the negotiation method your team already uses.
Book a short demo to sit across from David yourself, or tell us which terms procurement pushes hardest on in your deals.
Cookies and tags
With your consent, Microsoft Clarity records how you use our pages, and tags from Google, LinkedIn and Lemon Squeezy measure our ads and partner links. Nothing loads until you choose. Read the cookie policy